The open access movement in legal scholarship, inasmuch as it is driven within the law library community over concerns about the rising cost of legal information, fails to address – and in fact diverts resources from – the real problem facing law libraries today: the soaring costs of nonscholarly, commercially published, practitioner-oriented legal publications. The current system of legal scholarly publishing – in student-edited journals and without meaningful peer review – does not face the pressures to increase prices common in the science and health disciplines. One solution to this problem is for law schools to redirect some of their resources – intellectual capital, reputation, and student labor – to publishing legal information for practitioners rather than legal scholars.
I have two points to make here:
- I hope this article will start a dialogue on innovative solutions to the increasing prices of legal information products. The responses that have been adopted in other disciplines, such as open access scholarly publication, do not apply in our context where the cost of scholarly information is negligible compared to the price of practitioner-oriented publications.
- Law library literature is almost universally below the radar for law scholars. SSRN offers one medium for law librarians to bring their scholarship to the attention of the professoriate. Why are so few of us taking advantage of SSRN?
(Cross-posted at OOTJ).